An Analysis of Wilfred Owen’s Strange Meeting Essays

An Analysis of Wilfred Owen’s Strange Meeting Analysis of a working manuscript for Wilfred Owens Strange Meeting provides the student with insight into the creative process. Owens original wording coupled with his subsequent revisions illuminate how he may have intended the poem to be understood by the reader. Owens revisions show a determination to accomplish three apparent objectives. First, Owen paid close attention to the connotative meanings inherent in his diction. Equally as important, Owen attempted to refine his language mechanics to enhance the esthetic quality of his work. Finally, there is evidence of a concerted effort to universalize the poem for readers of diverse experience. In contrast to prose writing,†¦show more content†¦If the face displays fears, the reader can assume some attributes of the person and the situation of his death. Fears also brings some life to the image, which may be why the Norton version uses pains, which are not only easier to envision on a corpse, but also attribute different characteristics to the person. If the person felt fear, the reader is less likely to empathize with him. If he felt pain, then the reader may tend to ennoble the person, and understand in a very different way the situation of his death. Later in the same line, the word creatures is replaced by visions. This change brings more humanity to the subject removing the connotation of bestiality, while reinforcing the fact that the person is dead. The appearance of the dead man as a vision brings an unearthly quality to the scene without compromising the humanity of the soldier. Line 14 contains a similar change in wording. Owen substitutes strange for my. The dead soldier is not in actuality the speakers friend, so my is not a good word choice because of its personal nature. My also conveys little in the way of imagery. Str ange, however, reinforces the otherworldly dichotomy of the situation. Another example of connotative meanings at work occurs in line 12, which appears to have originally read Yet no blood pumped here from the upper ground. Owens revisions read reached him, and reached him there. The Norton Anthology

Kaylee Rosales. Mrs.Kline. Honors English 10. 6 April,

Kaylee Rosales Mrs.Kline Honors English 10 6 April, 2017 Title The Drug War has been a policy and a battle to stop drug flow into the U.S, cease drug production and to completely illuminate drugs entirely but results have shown otherwise. In 1971, President Richard Nixon first declared the Drug war and classified drugs as a number one public enemy shortly after drug use hit its peak in the 1960’s. The U.S previously had anti-drug laws but the laws were light and directed mainly to minorities. The following President Jimmy Carter believed in decriminalizing Marijuana and certain portions of Marijuana were legal to possess during his term but the legalization was shortly lived. A new attempted solution was a program Nancy Reagan, President†¦show more content†¦On estimate 1 out of every 111 adults will be arrested for drug charges. Out of males that have been imprisoned 57% were black or latino which feeds into the common argument that the Drug War causes a racial divide. Throughout the countless years of battling the number of ca sualties of both races have been expanding and on average over the past seven years. 165,000 documented homicides have occurred in Mexico alone, due to drug war violence. Not only has the Drug War cost billions, imprisoned millions and killed thousands and continues to do so daily. Critics argue that legalization of certain drugs will not end the drug war and that instead, it will cause more violence and issues for the county’s well being. In the mid-1980’s the cocaine epidemic hit and a large amount of crime, deaths from overdoses and violence came with it. The result of this was laws being placed with minimum punishment for drug trafficking to attempt to control the issue. Throughout the early 1990s crime started to slowly decrease and in 2013 the amount of crime was reduced in half. One viewpoint is that once the title of being non-violent labeled drug traffickers crime started to rise anew. Some crimes included murders of innocent bystanders and more drug flow into the U.S (Cook1). William J. Bennett and John P. Walters, Boston Globe writers, complicate matters further when they write â€Å"For 25 years before President Obama, U.S policy confronted drug

Conference of Yalta free essay sample

Written Statement The Yalta Conference, by Komar and Melamid This piece was painted in 1982, its style being oil on canvas. Komar and Melamid were two artists that formed part of the Official Artists Union that decided to expose some of their underground art in 1974. This painting depicts two men, a male body with an extraterrestrial head, and a circus-like canopy in the background. The people showed in this work are Roosevelt, the President of the United States at the time on the right (hidden by an alien face), Hitler in the middle, leader of the Nazi Germany (who was dead at the time), and Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union, on the right. The reason they were united was because of a Conference that took place. The Yalta Conference, in 1945, was a meeting between Stalin, Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill (Prime Minister of England) in order to establish Europes new boundaries after World War II. We will write a custom essay sample on Conference of Yalta or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The message this piece intends to convey is that many people think Stalin tricked Roosevelt into allowing the Soviet Union to control the countries of Eastern Europe. Although Hitler was not alive at the time, he appears instead of Churchill. Hitler can be seen with a silencing pose, with one finger over his mouth, hushing us to emphasize the secrecy of the meeting. Roosevelt owns an extraterrestrial head symbolizing that he was not part of the European world and did not understand Stalins craft and underhandedness. Stalin appears serious, staring at the viewer with intimidating eyes. Corruption and mischief can be felt in that environment. Our interpretation is not very different to what is really conveyed. Hitler and Stalin s faces inspire mischief and bad vibrations. Corruption is easily spotted and the outsider position of Roosevelt is interesting. The creativity and thought put into replacing his head with an aliens is admirable, and in our opinion is the highlight of the painting. The circus like canopy in the back resembles people being fooled as in circuses, in this case Roosevelt. Hitlers face is not fully exposed, a shadow covers his left part of the face. His silencing pose automatically inspires us to think negatively about his intentions. Conference of Yalta By abhirhathi

Romeo And Juliet Essays (487 words) - Characters In Romeo And Juliet

Romeo And Juliet Lovers are often stopped from falling in love, but lovers have faith to help them love each other. In William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, two star-crossed lovers are paused from falling in love, due to two family feuds. Fate leads Romeo and Juliet to meet and to die. Romeo and Juliet are fated to meet, although they are from different worlds. For example, when Romeo tells Benvolio of his first love, Benvolio tells him that they will soon be together, but Romeo claims ?in that bit you miss. She'll not be hit with Cupid's arrow, she hath plans wit? (I, I, 216-217). Rosaline was not meant for Romeo. Their love shared was unreal. Cupid knows that someone else along the way is destined for him. In addition, when preparing for a party at the Capulets' house, Romeo believes ?his mind misgives some consequences, yet hanging in the stars shall bitterly begin his fearful date,? (I, iv, 113-115) if he attends the party. The stars are predicting Romeo's future. They know that he will meet someone, but something between the two was just not meant to be. Furthermore, when Juliet asks Romeo how he found her, he replies, ?'By love, that first did prompt me to inquire. He lent me counsel, and I lent him my eyes. I am no pilot'? (II, ii, 85-87). Romeo's instincts lead him. Juliet is his true love and his soul knows where to guide him. Even if fate helped the two lovers to be together, it also helped bring them to punishment. Romeo and Juliet's path of love is fated for disaster. For example, when Juliet learns that Romeo is a Montague, she realizes ?[her] only love springs from [her] only hate? (I, iv, 52). Juliet knows inside that falling love with Romeo will only make the family feud even worse. Juliet also knows that the two can be killed for loving across their group. In addition, Juliet believes all men fickle and that Romeo ?be fickle, for [she] hopes thou wilt not keep him long, but send him back? (III, v, 60-64). Juliet hopes that Romeo will plays with her heart. She wants this because she wants the two lovers to end up in grief together, then they can be happy again. Furthermore, Juliet believes that she will meet Romeo ?by leaving earth? [to] comfort [her], counsel [her]? (III, v, 218-220). Romeo and Juliet's love is too strong to be broken down. The only way the two lovers can be happy is in heaven; therefore, death is the answer. Romeo and Juliet rely on death to satisfy them. Because the Montagues and Capulets disapprove of the couple meeting, they must die together to please themselves. They do not care what people say, they just want to be happy. Nowadays, couples still rely on death to help satisfy them, like Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare